After much protest, many arrests and various other confrontations between protesters, bystanders and “law enforcement” the G20 Summit has ended. Yet, the 61st meeting of the United Nations General Assembly, convened with little or no protests. What is the difference? Is there such a difference between the two groups, that requires one to be protested and the other widely accepted?
According to the G20 website, “The Group of Twenty (G-20) Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors was established in 1999 to bring together systemically important industrialized and developing economies to discuss key issues in the global economy. The inaugural meeting of the G-20 took place in Berlin, on December 1516, 1999, hosted by German and Canadian finance ministers…The G-20 is made up of the finance ministers and central bank governors of 19 countries: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States of America, the European Union, who is represented by the rotating Council presidency and the European Central Bank, is the 20th member of the G-20.”
In other words, the G20 is comprised of the finance ministers and central bank governors of 19 of the 32 largest economies in the world; which represents roughly 85% of the global economy. They discuss ways to manipulate not only individual economies and currencies, but also the economy worldwide. Don’t believe me? Think I’m coming up with a conspiracy theory? Just read what the G20 Pittsburgh Summit website says, “At the Pittsburgh G-20 Summit, leaders reviewed the progress made since the Washington and London Summits and together they discussed further actions to assure a sound and sustainable recovery from the global financial and economic crisis.” (emphasis added)
For nearly 100 years the Federal Reserve has been claiming they were responsible for creating a “stable currency”, which has been the complete opposite of what has happened. How then, will 20 central banks, which are just as bad as the Fed, create a “stable economy”? They can’t, and it’s understandable why people would protest such an organization of globalists.
So, what’s the difference between the G20 and the UN?
According to the UN website, “The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945 after the Second World War by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights. Due to its unique international character, and the powers vested in its founding Charter, the Organization can take action on a wide range of issues, and provide a forum for its 192 Member States to express their views, through the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council and other bodies and committees.” And, “The General Assembly is the main deliberative organ of the United Nations. It is composed of representatives of all member states, each of which has one vote. Decisions on important questions, such as those on peace and security, admission of new members and budgetary matters, require a two-thirds majority. Decisions on other questions are by simple majority.”
It seems, the UN claims to have power to affect every aspect of your life; however, I defy their “authority”. If you think the USA government is “efficient” you will love the “efficiency” of the UN and need to look no further than the “Food for Oil” program, not to mention allegations of kickbacks, the rape of minors in the Congo sex scandal, and a total lack of accountability.
I still don’t understand why people aren’t protesting such a multi-national, globalist organization. Unless people have figured out that, the UN General Assembly is made up of the “puppet” heads-of-state, with the G20 (and similar organizations; G7, WTO, Bilderberg, Tri-Lateral Commission, CFR, etc) being the PUPPETMASTER!