by R. Lee Wrights
BURNET, Texas (May 22) – President Obama has perfected a politician’s most coveted talent, speaking out of both sides of his mouth at the same time while sounding like a great leader. The latest display of how he’s honed this skill was a speech he just gave in El Paso, Texas. From one side of his mouth the president said he wanted to do his part to lead a “constructive, civil debate” on immigration, while from the other side of his mouth he accused Republicans of wanting to build an alligator-filled moat along the border.
Frank Zappa once said that we were a nation of laws, badly written and randomly enforced. Our immigration laws are a perfect example of that principle in action. Americans routinely ignore or flaunt dumb laws. You do that every time you drive five miles over the speed limit. What many American’s do when confronted with a stupid, dumb or unjust law is, in effect, nullify that law by ignoring it.
Millions of Americans nullified Prohibition in the 1920s during America’s first failed attempt to control human behavior by outlawing a substance almost everybody wanted – alcohol. Disobeying unjust law is ingrained in the American consciousness. Thomas Jefferson said that it wasn’t just our right, but our duty. He said, “If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” Perhaps it was the former president who inspired Dr. Martin Luther King to say, “There comes a time when a moral man can’t obey a law which his conscience tells him is unjust.”
That’s what is happening with the so-called “illegal immigration problem.” We essentially have a black market in labor created because the law is unrealistic, unfair, unjust and unenforceable. Democrats and Republicans are simply not interested in resolving this issue because it’s too valuable for them to exploit it for political purposes. Politicians want you to believe that illegal immigrants come here only to leach off welfare, or that they are a threat to national security, or that they will take jobs away from Americans. As usual, Democrats and Republicans use arguments intended to instill fear, to divide us against another, to curry favor with special interest, ethnic, racial or language groups, and to divert our attention from the truth.
People come to America — legally or illegally — for the same reasons they’ve been coming here for centuries. Immigrants come here looking for freedom, for economic opportunity and to make a better life for themselves and their children. They will continue to come here legally or illegally so long as America holds that promise.
The economic reality is that most low-skilled immigrants enter the U.S. illegally because there are hundreds of thousands of new jobs here waiting to be filled; there aren’t enough Americans available to fill them; and, the law doesn’t allow them to enter America quickly and easily enough to fill these temporary jobs. For example, if you are from India and hold a doctorate, it will take you only about five years to complete the process to legally immigrate. But, if you are an unskilled Mexican laborer it will take you 130 years to immigrate to the U.S. and legally become a citizen. No wonder people are swimming the Rio Grande.
Tougher immigration laws won’t reverse this natural and historic process. More laws will not keep people from crossing our borders anymore than the laws we have right now. And, the very idea of building a high-tech version of the Berlin Wall should be particularity repugnant to Americans, especially those of us who grew up watching images of people being shot as they attempted to escape from tyranny in that German city.
Treating illegal immigration as an economic issue means changing immigration law to match the reality of a dynamic society and labor market. Instead of building walls we should be opening doors. America should be creating a sane and humane immigration process to screen out terrorists and criminals while allowing honest, peaceful, hardworking people to come here to work and help build on the American dream as millions have done before them.
R. Lee Wrights, 52, a libertarian writer and political activist, is seeking the presidential nomination because he believes the Libertarian message in 2012 must be a loud, clear and unequivocal call to stop all war. To that end he has pledged that 10 percent of all donations to his campaign will be spent for ballot access so that the stop all war message can be heard in all 50 states. Wrights is a lifetime member of the Libertarian Party and co-founder and editor of of the free speech online magazine Liberty For All. Born in Winston-Salem, N.C., he now lives and works in Texas.