by: Tom Knapp
I have lots of friends and associates; in this I consider myself much blessed.
I also consider it a basic obligation of disclosure to point out that by being my friend or associate, one may well be at risk of prosecution under US Code, Title 18, Chapter 115, §2384.
No, I am not herein “admitting guilt” to violations of said portions of the US Code.
For one thing, I don’t recognize the US Code or said portions thereof as binding upon anyone who hasn’t explicitly agreed to be bound by it.
For another, the things are so broadly written that anyone who votes, runs for public office, solicits votes (especially the votes of military personnel) or joins a political party is arguably in violation of all of them (if you don’t think an election is a “means of force or violence,” you’re not living in the real world). So it’s not like I’m uniquely in legal jeopardy here.
And finally, anyone who’s observed the operation of what passes for a “court” in the United States in recent years knows that these institutions are, for the most part, mere extensions of the prosecution teams with only pro forma claims to just or even nominally impartial proceedings (although rare cases of jury nullification do sometimes act as a corrective). I hold such institutions in far too much contempt to “plead” if charged, let alone preemptively/prospectively admit the “guilt” which they assume from the start.
All things considered, maybe being my friend or associate isn’t really any more dangerous than being anyone else’s. In the declining 21st century United States, legal entanglements seem to be pretty much the equivalent of a straight-up roulette bet, at least if one lacks the “get out of jail free card” issued to members of the political class. But I still thought it worth apprising you of the risks.
Reposted from Kn@ppster